Assessment Revisited - Part I

August 16, 2019

It’s that time of year – the  time when we sense the summer fading and the press of the school year.

With the start of the school year, many of you are considering having your child assessed, but not really sure what is involved or what is its purpose.

As is true with much of childhood, psychology and education, I find there are often unnecessary complications taking place with regard to assessment and many other related issues.

Sometimes a previous assessment has been completed and parents will share previous reports.   Often the reports are uninterpretable or meaningless to the parents (yet may look impressive in their number of pages) and they feel bewildered by it all.

As I thumb through the reports, I often quietly (sometimes not too quietly) wonder if the parents’ basic questions were even answered in ways they could understand.

What got me thinking about this was a mom who was interested in having her child assessed.  She emailed me a range of in-depth questions  that she hoped might be revealed or commented on within the assessment.


I didn’t want to disappoint her, but this is what I said with regard to the questions raised:

            In some ways, the questions you are asking about assessment are over-complicating in terms of the goals that I have when I assess a child. In       somewhat simplified terms, the psychoeducational assessment provides a “snapshot” in a moment of time as to where your child is in terms of her development in key areas of cognitive, academic and emotional functioning.  

The “snapshot” is a starting point in understanding your child’s strengths and weaknesses and what you should do next.  I call it “next-step thinking.”

         Beyond that, there are basic questions that are typically raised when conducting a psychoeducational assessment.  

         What I am asking is whether there any identifiable “cracks in the foundation” (i.e., weaknesses or deficits) that need to be understood or addressed going forward?  

         Beyond identifying the basic cracks, we are considering what are the next best steps in terms of helping your child?   Are there any treatments or interventions that make sense given the assessment? Are there alternative school choices? (The mom was considering a private school for her daughter.)

Ideally, an assessment should be a practical vehicle, a springboard that can help guide you in terms of your child’s areas of identified needs.  The report generated  from the assessment should be practical and fairly straight-forward in conveying the findings in as much jargon-free language as possible.  That is, you should understand the report and what the numbers mean.  (e.g., “Hey, I see a score of 7 in Similarities in my child’s assessment.  What does that mean?  Is that good or bad?”)

In the next few posts I will elaborate upon the fundamental questions and issues being raised in a psychoeducational assessment process to try and demystify them further for you.

Takeaway Points

More complicated, more pages and more expensive is not necessarily better in an assessment for your child.

Stay focused on the basic questions and what is important in an assessment.

More to follow in coming blog posts.


Copyright, 2019
Questions or topics email Dr. Selznick.  Not in the South Jersey area? For a free 15 Minute Consultation, contact Dr. Selznick: email –

To purchase a signed copy of  “What To Do About Dyslexia: 25 Essential Concepts” & Dr. Selznick’s other books and to receive blog updates go to

Leave a reply
Dog With a BoneIt’s That Time of Year
All comments (2)
  • Susan Rosen
    August 17, 2019 at 11:21 am

    Yes cracks in my son’s foundation. He is now 14, about 2 years ago a few of his teachers and special ed teachers were chatting about […] Read MoreYes cracks in my son’s foundation. He is now 14, about 2 years ago a few of his teachers and special ed teachers were chatting about my son Cooper’s cracks in his foundation. He was retested in 6/2017 for Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement IV in Haddonfield’s middle school. He was to start the Wilson reading system. He is Central Auditory Processing Disorder. The school system waits to test for this I feel late ( they say because it is non conclusive too young) ( I know as mom he was not hearing me well at a young age, at a very close range nor response) He missed some very important early academics causing delays such as reading, spelling, passage comprehension, sentence writing fluency, work attack. I do feel an astute group of teachers could see a bright , funny, helpful, frustrated young boy and knew from there experience and this tests that my son had cracks in his educational foundation that the Wilson Reading System will help fill. May you have any suggestions or helpful advice? I would be most appreciative. Thank you, Susan Rosen Read Less


Leave Your Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up for Down to Earth Advice!

Sign up to receive blogs, learn about upcoming teleseminars, and hear about other exciting news from Dr. Selz.

Sign Me Up